The record · Topic 05 of 15
How much do people want it
What got approved
The amount each state can hand out to builders of affordable homes went up by 12%, permanently, starting this year. One housing group called it the largest increase since these limits were first set.
It was bundled with hundreds of other subjects, most of which have never been polled. So we can't say whether Americans wanted the rest of it, and we won't say how any one member voted on this — their single vote covered everything in the package, not this. See polling qualifications.
Grants to help towns write housing plans. Permission to spend community development money on new construction. Higher loan limits. A program to turn empty buildings into homes. And the end of the rule that manufactured homes must be built on a permanent frame.
This one is a housing law about housing. It was also bundled with a ban on the Federal Reserve issuing a digital currency until 2030 — a subject with no polling that meets our bar, either way. So again, a member's single vote covered both, and we won't say how anyone voted on the housing part. See polling qualifications.
What could have been
While this ranks 5th of 15 for agreement, the bill written to do it has sat untouched. It's called the Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act, it's backed by members of both parties, and it does one thing: expand the tax break for builders who make homes ordinary people can afford. It was introduced in 2025 and has never been brought up for a vote.
And the law is less than people asked for. The same polling that produced the 83% also found majorities of both parties in favor of things the law leaves out: tens of billions in federal investment to build affordable housing, and $24 billion more in rental assistance for very low-income, elderly and disabled people. Where the law bars corporations from owning more than 350 single-family homes, majorities favor barring them from owning any.
A bill about one subject would have let every member say yes or no to this and nothing else — and let you see who said what. Instead both laws that touched this arrived bundled with other subjects, so no member's position on affordable housing can be separated from everything else they were voting on.
Additional notes
Nothing to report. Where a government department changes a rule affecting this topic, it appears here — never counted as the government getting something done. Why.
Where these came from
Found a mistake?
Corrections are made on the page, dated, with what changed left where you can see it. See the corrections log, or write to info@fundamentallyhuman.com and tell us.